Teams

Yv.Barrow40C6.5

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-11vs Ke.Huffstetler40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Coyne / Lee Veit vs Kelly Creekmore / Molly Clark6-3, 6-1
2024-09-04vs Je.Wolborsky40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Uthe / Lee Veit vs Ngoc Tran / Marie Gelston3-6, 4-6
2024-08-27vs An.Pleasants40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesLee Veit / Christina Allen vs Angela Pleasants / Ashley Walton3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-21vs Sh.Rogers40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmie Irby / Alison Uthe vs Shelly Rogers / Kristi Wilson7-5, 6-3
2024-08-16vs Ta.LeFevre40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Uthe / Amie Irby vs Sarah Bell / Lindsey Taylor7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Mary Beth Broyles
published
3.47
Alison Uthe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Ashley Gaylord
published 3.5
3.29
Lee Veit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Harriet Mills
published
3.22
Christina Allen
published 3.5
3.22
Julie Coyne
published
3.18
Amie Irby
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Yvonne Barrow
published
3.10
Jillian Good
published
3.07
Ramsay Younger
published
3.07
Libby Stubbs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Veit + Alison Uthe3353% gamesnot enough data
Amie Irby + Alison Uthe314 matchesnot enough data
Christina Allen + Alison Uthe224 matchesnot enough data
Amie Irby + Lee Veit123 matchesnot enough data
Libby Stubbs + Yvonne Barrow123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Coyne + Jillian Good123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Beth Broyles
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Alison Uthe
75W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ashley Gaylord
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Lee Veit
83W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Harriet Mills
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Christina Allen
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Julie Coyne
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amie Irby
99W–119L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Yvonne Barrow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jillian Good
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Ramsay Younger
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Libby Stubbs
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.