Teams

1.TOC.Feuerstein

2022 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs 5.PW.FitzgeraldWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrenda Steele / Olga Tiselsky vs Susan Collard / Janette Cunningham4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Powell / Karen Zapko vs Lisa Allen / Michelle Fitzgerald6-3, 6-4
2022-04-25vs 6.MD.FoxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Steele / Olga Tiselsky vs Joanne Burton / Merri Metcalf4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Takako Schenberger vs Diane Chinnis / Dawnette Scott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-20vs 8.KF.EvansWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Zapko / Sharon Paye vs Jannifer Frazier / Jane Doe6-3, 3-2
2022-04-11vs 2.TOC.CampbellWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Gast / Sharon Paye vs Karin Campbell / Nicole Gagnon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Takako Schenberger vs Debbie Zaccardelli / Rhonda Kaspar6-2, 6-4
2022-03-30vs 7.LOCH.LeBlancWon 10
W#2 DoublesTakako Schenberger / Deb Lanier vs Jill Cardella / KAREN CROW6-2, 6-3
2022-03-03vs 9. TOC IrishWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Takako Schenberger vs Regina Davis / Lisa Mason6-0, 6-2
2022-02-24vs 3.PW.RaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Gast / Kim Tobey vs Pam Smith / Harriet Wilson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Paye / Olga Tiselsky vs Elise Steagall / Colleen Foy6-3, 6-3
2022-02-17vs 4.PW.MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Zapko / Pamela Deloatch vs Adela McGeehin / Dale Martin2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Deb Lanier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Debbie Powell
published 3.5
3.24
Brenda Steele
published 3.5
3.19
Olga Tiselsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Takako Schenberger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Zapko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Donna Gast
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Tobey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Sharon Paye
published
Julie Barnhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Powell + Deb Lanier14266% games−0.4% vs expected
Takako Schenberger + Deb Lanier27561% games−3.1% vs expected
Donna Gast + Kim Tobey6550% gamesnot enough data
Karen Zapko + Donna Gast3541% gamesnot enough data
Takako Schenberger + Karen Zapko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deb Lanier
488W–223L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Debbie Powell
39W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Brenda Steele
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Olga Tiselsky
129W–135L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Takako Schenberger
243W–154L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Karen Zapko
47W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Donna Gast
75W–72L career · 8 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Kim Tobey
75W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
Sharon Paye
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Julie Barnhart
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.