Teams

BC-LLW-MCC/JoyHuffman

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-06vs BC-SouthEnd/VanessaHyttenbergWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoy Huffman vs Bridget Parrilla7-5, 6-1
2021-05-23vs BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamondWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Eastman / Joy Huffman vs Kay Cotter / Evelyn Gossett6-1, 6-3
2021-05-02vs BC-MiraCosta/KarieLantermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrina Goedemans / Joy Huffman vs Valerie Starr / Deborah Russell6-2, 6-1
2021-04-25vs BC-SouthEnd/VanessaHyttenbergLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoy Huffman vs Vanessa Hyttenberg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Sonja Harrington
published
3.49
Mojgan Vakili
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.34
Leah Duke
published
3.25
Amanda West
published 3.5
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
published
Irina Goedemans
published 3.5
3.19
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.18
Lora Penczar
published
3.06
Joy Huffman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Donna Hughes
published 3.5
2.91
2.69
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.38
Staci Carey
published
Julie Fields
published
Nicole Shepley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Maloney + Staci Carey3537% gamesnot enough data
Amanda West + Janet Zuccarini044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Zuccarini + Lora Penczar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonja Harrington
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Mojgan Vakili
80W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
Leah Duke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Janet Zuccarini
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Irina Goedemans
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Joy Huffman
39W–41L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Donna Hughes
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.49
Staci Carey
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
2.38
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicole Shepley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.