← Teams

SAC-Natarajan/Ilcheva

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alison Marsh Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Tamara Justus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
Deepak Selvanathan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Vimal Natarajan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.48
Molly Odonnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Ryan Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Shari Levelle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Diane di Vito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Brady Berry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2018-11-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesRyan Patterson / Jenna Hayes vs Chizuru Watanabe / Neil Soiffer7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTheresa Berry / Brady Berry vs Ashley Schneider / Yuya Fujii6-2, 6-1
2018-11-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesAlison Marsh Harrison / Ryan Patterson vs Candi Kleiva / Joshuah Kleiva6-2, 6-4
2018-11-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Kelley Martin vs Joe Warner / Suzanne DeLea6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRodger DeGeorge / Shari Levelle vs Zachary Kinavey / Sierra Wright6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrady Berry / Theresa Berry vs Butch Dela Cruz / Anna Koepke6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2018-11-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Julie Hansen vs Michael Kardas / Mary Chennault7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs Alex Harbell / Michele Waite6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane di Vito / Ajay Kumar Tippisetti vs Craig Mcreary / Cindy Rushall6-3, 6-0
2018-10-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSanthanakrishnan Balakrishnan / Tamara Justus vs Brian Hughes / Brenda Falson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRyan Patterson / Jenna Hayes vs Kevin Hughes / Sherri Sacconaghi6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSanthanakrishnan Balakrishnan / Tamara Justus vs Craig Mcreary / Jill Chapman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTheresa Berry / Brady Berry vs Michael Kardas / Stephanie Jones6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAjay Kumar Tippisetti / Shari Levelle vs Roger Gwin / Cindy Rushall7-6, 6-3
2018-09-29Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRodger DeGeorge / Shari Levelle vs Carrie Engle / Joe Warner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs Zachary Kinavey / Sierra Wright6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDiane di Vito / Jeff Garrison vs Yascha Noonberg / Anna Koepke7-6, 6-2
2018-09-15Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDeepak Selvanathan / Julie Hansen vs Jennie Brawn / John Wong7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVimal Natarajan / Diane di Vito vs CRAIG WILLIAMS / Michele O'Brien6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRyan Patterson / Alison Marsh Harrison vs Amanda Solomon / David Bender6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alison Marsh Harrison
29W–25L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Tamara Justus
98W–68L career
19%81%0%
3.98
4
Deepak Selvanathan
64W–74L career
1%95%4%
3.83
4
Vimal Natarajan
78W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Ryan Patterson
11W–16L career
0%82%18%
3.48
3.5
Shari Levelle
63W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.16
3
Diane di Vito
45W–53L career
not enough data
—
0
Brady Berry
56W–45L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.