Teams

Sandy Springs TC (Jordan Lear)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-01-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesSophie Pollak / Laine Hartman vs Lisa Lee / Jen Wunderlich6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCristina Abreu / Sophie Pollak vs Emily Price / Ali Avery5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Miesje Zimmermann
published
4.00
Laine Hartman
published
3.91
Kealy Hartman
published
3.86
Savannah Smith
published
3.83
Allie Svabik
published 4
3.82
Elizabeth Faist
published
3.77
Anna Idenden
published 4
Alex Ottoson
published 4
3.67
Sophie Pollak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jessica Jakulski
published
3.32
Rachel McKay
published
3.29
Jennifer Wrenn
published
Cristina Abreu
published 3.5
Eliza Taylor
published
Jordan Lear
published
Martha Malone
published
Mary Smither
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laine Hartman + Kealy Hartman6170% games+18.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Faist + Miesje Zimmermann5167% gamesnot enough data
Martha Malone + Kealy Hartman5068% gamesnot enough data
Mary Smither + Jordan Lear404 matchesnot enough data
Anna Idenden + Jessica Jakulski314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Faist + Jessica Jakulski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miesje Zimmermann
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
Laine Hartman
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
Kealy Hartman
17W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
Savannah Smith
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.86
4
Allie Svabik
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Elizabeth Faist
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Anna Idenden
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alex Ottoson
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Bridgette Krauter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sophie Pollak
18W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
Jessica Jakulski
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Rachel McKay
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennifer Wrenn
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cristina Abreu
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Eliza Taylor
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Lear
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Malone
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Smither
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.