Teams

Williams Y - Saig

2022 Duval Trilevel Men · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-11vs DUVAL/Van WesteringLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Saig / Govind Budda vs Corey Graf / William Ferguson4-6, 2-6
2022-10-04vs Jax Golf - MerriamLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Saig / Govind Budda vs Austin Merriam / Tim Orr4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Saig / Stephan Abraham vs Chris Westberry / Charles King1-6, 2-6
2022-09-20vs AldenLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephan Abraham / Govind Budda vs Dennis Lamoureux / Paul Vergara4-6, 1-6
2022-09-13vs Eagle Harbor - SchilkofskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesEugene Kasper / Louis Saig vs Riley Dixon / David Schilkofski4-6, 3-6
2022-09-06vs DUVAL/Van WesteringLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouis Saig / Govind Budda vs Chris Le / William Ferguson6-7, 2-6
2022-08-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Mcgehee / Govind Budda vs Austin Merriam / Cameron Nash4-6, 4-6
2022-08-16vs AldenWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndres Gutierrez / Louis Saig vs Scott Suhrer / David Frakt6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Andres Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.29
Steven Mcgehee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Govind Budda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Louis Saig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Eugene Kasper
published 4
3.83
Cort Raithel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Colson Mcgehee
published 4
3.68
Stephan Abraham
published
3.66
Jesse Rogers
published
3.43
Michael Halusek
published
Charles McGehee
published 3.5
Ed Davila
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Saig + Govind Budda4356% gamesnot enough data
Louis Saig + Steven Mcgehee3256% gamesnot enough data
Charles McGehee + Cort Raithel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andres Gutierrez
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
Steven Mcgehee
42W–51L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Govind Budda
50W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
Louis Saig
105W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Eugene Kasper
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Cort Raithel
173W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Colson Mcgehee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephan Abraham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Jesse Rogers
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michael Halusek
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ed Davila
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.