Teams

Tran

2022 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Monique Eldridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
June Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Minou Chau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Eldridge / Madeline Rose Allaire Havens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadeline Rose Allaire Havens / Minou Chau vs Tarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer6-4, 6-3
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMinou Chau / June Wu vs Tracy Gagnon / Maureen Dugan6-3, 6-4
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMinou Chau / Madeline Rose Allaire Havens vs Maureen Dugan / Whitney Ludtke6-2, 6-0
2022-07-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMinou Chau / June Wu vs Tarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMinou Chau / June Wu vs Michelle Mehr / Lisa Volle6-1, 6-1
2022-06-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadeline Rose Allaire Havens / Minou Chau vs Amanda Jensen / Hanna Jensen7-6, 6-3
2022-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonique Eldridge / June Wu vs Michelle Mehr / Lisa Volle6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Monique Eldridge
102W–56L career
2%98%1%
4.17
4.5
June Wu
148W–91L career
58%42%0%
3.83
4.5
Minou Chau
115W–106L career
68%32%0%
3.80

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.