Teams

RINCONADA PK 18AM4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-11vs RINCONADA PK 18AM4.5DLost 13
L#1 DoublesSurik Torosyan / Edmond Wang vs Andy King / Justin Sleasman1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDan Nandra vs Omar Molina6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYang Gao / Steve Tsai vs Alex Yang / Allen Shih4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesXiaoquan Yi vs Thomas Wang3-6, 0-6
2025-04-09vs RINCONADA PK 18AM4.5DSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDan Nandra / Sikai Huang vs Andy King / Mitch Hu6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDeepak Srikanth vs Piyush Lakhawat6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesElliot Beak vs HsiaoTing Ko2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Tsai / John Chen vs Alex Yang / Jason Kuo2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Deepak Srikanth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Dan Nandra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Elliot Beak
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.03
Yang Gao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Edmond Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Surik Torosyan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Steve Tsai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.96
Kuan Chang
published
3.93
Sikai Huang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Xiaoquan Yi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Yui Tantiyavarong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Liang Song
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Louis Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edmond Wang + Yang Gao213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deepak Srikanth
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Dan Nandra
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Elliot Beak
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Yang Gao
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
Edmond Wang
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Surik Torosyan
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
3.99
Steve Tsai
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Kuan Chang
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
Sikai Huang
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.93
Xiaoquan Yi
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Yui Tantiyavarong
6W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.81
Liang Song
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.80
Louis Kim
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.