Teams

CV-Shadow Mountain/Ringer

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Celeste Armitage
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Caridad Pacheco
published 4
3.56
Ann Habeger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Kim Glasgow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janice Campbell
published
Jill Lawrence Polls
published
Kenzie Thompson
published
Ledean Nilsen
published
Martha Church
published
Mary Pinnow
published
Nancy Closson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Armitage + Janice Campbell41040% gamesnot enough data
Kim Glasgow + Martha Church224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Armitage
70W–83L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Caridad Pacheco
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Ann Habeger
89W–85L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kim Glasgow
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Janice Campbell
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Lawrence Polls
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenzie Thompson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ledean Nilsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Church
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Pinnow
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.