Teams

Copsey

2024 Howard Columbia Singles · Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-28vs Khan - KTASplit 11
W#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Dat Doan6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Amir Moinfar2-6, 6-7
2024-10-23vs Khan - KTALost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Rob Dragonette3-6, 1-6
2024-10-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Amir Moinfar1-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs Khan - KTAWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Jose Miguel Sacin6-4, 6-3
2024-10-16vs Khan - KTASplit 11
L#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Rob Dragonette0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Omar Khan6-2, 6-2
2024-10-09vs Khan - KTAWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Rob Dragonette7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Rizwan Rashid6-2, 6-4
2024-10-07vs Khan - KTALost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Rob Dragonette2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAlan Copsey vs Amir Moinfar2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMike Watchke vs Rizwan Rashid3-6, 4-6
2024-09-27vs Khan - KTASplit 11
L#1 SinglesScott Mennealy vs Rob Dragonette5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAndrew Aylward vs Jay Anzures6-2, 6-4
2024-09-22vs Khan - KTALost 01
L#3 SinglesMike Watchke vs Omar Khan3-6, 4-6
2024-09-15vs Khan - KTALost 01
L#1 SinglesAbid Ghori vs Rob Dragonette1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
William Briscoe
published
3.98
Scott Mennealy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Alan Copsey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.81
Andrew Aylward
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.78
Ethan Che
published
3.77
Abid Ghori
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.60
Brian Wagner
published 4
3.44
Mike Watchke
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Mennealy + Alan Copsey3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Briscoe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Scott Mennealy
102W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Alan Copsey
58W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Andrew Aylward
52W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
Ethan Che
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
Abid Ghori
79W–65L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Brian Wagner
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Mike Watchke
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.