Teams

LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-23vs LATA18/Nguyen/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Peeples / Melissa Taylor vs Lauren Robertson / Kacey Rugg4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Estes / Betty Joyce vs Morgan Gardner / Amber Bryant0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Feaster / Amanda Turpin vs Lisa Hamrick / Kelly Berryhill2-6, 4-6
2025-09-02vs LATA18/Nguyen/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Taylor / Megan Peeples vs Kaitlin Morris / Caroline King1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCecilia Nilsson / Tiffany Feaster vs Amy Redfield / Lauren Robertson6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCorrina Kleemoff / Denise Holmes vs Kristin Senn / Lisa Hamrick2-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs LATA18/Nguyen/LCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Taylor / Tiffany Feaster vs Amber Bryant / Kirsten Serba0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Turpin / Corrina Kleemoff vs Melissa Brightbill / Stacy Lyons3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCecilia Nilsson / Lori Yuris vs Megan Freiburger / Kaitlin Morris0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Amanda Turpin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Betty Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Cecilia Nilsson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Corrina Kleemoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Debbie Gee
published 3.5
3.25
Rita Squires
published
3.25
Tiffany Feaster
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Denise Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Megan Peeples
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lori Yuris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Meg Estes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Turpin + Corrina Kleemoff5746% games+6.6% vs expected
Lori Yuris + Cecilia Nilsson5455% games+2.7% vs expected
Meg Estes + Megan Peeples3451% games−6.5% vs expected
Tiffany Feaster + Meg Estes1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Turpin
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Betty Joyce
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Cecilia Nilsson
43W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Corrina Kleemoff
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Gee
34W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Rita Squires
29W–43L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Tiffany Feaster
16W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Denise Holmes
20W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Megan Peeples
16W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lori Yuris
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Meg Estes
31W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.