Teams

Riley

2026 TriLevel 18&over-NE · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.21 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brian Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Michael Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Blake Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
John Gatlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kevin Neal
published
2.92
Chris Jabil
published 3
2.85
Andy Burleson
published 3
Cody Carson
published 3
2.45
Ben Galjour
published 3
2.39
Cagen Garriga
published 3
2.26
Josh Riley
published
Glenn Barker
published
Shane Turner
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Quinn
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Michael Duncan
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Blake Kennedy
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
John Gatlin
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Kevin Neal
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Chris Jabil
32W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Andy Burleson
19W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Cody Carson
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Ben Galjour
8W–26L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
3
Cagen Garriga
19W–16L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Josh Riley
5W–29L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.26
Glenn Barker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shane Turner
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.