Teams

GTC RED

2021 CTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-13vs KNO MAROONWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Houy / Paul Gronewoller vs Richard Flanigan / Kevin Parnell6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMike Lammens / Gary Stiefler vs Rick Lannon / John Darden6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLawrence Gabler / Eddie Schroback vs Bill Lacock / Mai Nguyen6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2021-08-06vs GTC GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Rinehart / Paul Gronewoller vs Brian Berglund / Brian Wylie1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-30vs KC GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Gronewoller / Mark Rousseau vs Terry Egert / Robert Kelly6-2, 6-4
2021-07-23vs SSG ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Houy / Mark Rousseau vs Roger Overbey / Gary Murphy6-7, 3-6
2021-07-09vs DTC SILVERWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Houy / Paul Gronewoller vs Rich Pellicore / Anthony Kay6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andy Rinehart
published 4
3.72
Michael Runda
published 4
3.59
Stephen Houy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Paul Gronewoller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Bruce Herr
published 3.5
Eddie Schroback
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher Anton
published
Gary Stiefler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lawrence Gabler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Rousseau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marlin Godown
published
Mike Lammens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Suechting
published
Steven Blumberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Herr + Paul Gronewoller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Rinehart
36W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Michael Runda
93W–63L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Stephen Houy
90W–35L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
3.59
4
Paul Gronewoller
90W–93L career · 4 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bruce Herr
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Eddie Schroback
10W–5L career · type A · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Christopher Anton
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Gary Stiefler
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Lawrence Gabler
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Mark Rousseau
24W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marlin Godown
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Lammens
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Steve Suechting
6W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steven Blumberg
55W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.