Teams

Brevard/McGuigan/65&Over8.0M

2025 Brevard Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-17vs Kiwi - AllebachWon 20
W#1 DoublesSelwyn Mitchell / Eric Maalt vs Mark Breheny / Frank Daneshgar6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMax McDonald / Adrian Richard Verzaal vs Rex Gomez / Robert Lang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-10vs Kiwi - AllebachSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSelwyn Mitchell / Edward Rokus vs Carl Hartman / Rex Gomez6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTony Bender / Michael Runda vs Richard Allebach / Richard Denyer3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-03vs Kiwi - AllebachSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Runda / Edward Rokus vs Richard Allebach / Rex Gomez6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMax McDonald / Selwyn Mitchell vs Mark Breheny / Frank Daneshgar2-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Kiwi - AllebachWon 10
W#2 DoublesMax McDonald / Selwyn Mitchell vs Ron Gilroy / Rex Gomez6-4, 6-1
2025-01-20vs Kiwi - AllebachWon 21
W#1 DoublesSelwyn Mitchell / Mike Dickens vs Mark Breheny / Robert Lang4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Runda / Patrick McGuigan vs Ron Gilroy / Rex Gomez3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMax McDonald / Edward Rokus vs Frank Daneshgar / Richard Denyer6-0, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Kiwi - AllebachSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMichael Runda / Eric Maalt vs Carl Hartman / Frank Daneshgar6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMax McDonald / Mike Dickens vs Rex Gomez / Richard Denyer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Patrick McGuigan
published
3.72
Michael Runda
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Eric Maalt
published
Max McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mike Dickens
published
Selwyn Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tony Bender
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Selwyn Mitchell + Max McDonald3647% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick McGuigan
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Michael Runda
65W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Adrian Richard Verzaal
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Maalt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Max McDonald
46W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Dickens
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Selwyn Mitchell
27W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Bender
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.