Teams

LCTA18/Wehunt-Bowers/Maybank

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-13vs LCTA18/Wilhelm-Campbell/MaybankLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdaire Pennington / Tara White vs Tijana Subotic / Caitlin Kardohely2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElisabeth King / Stacy Messersmith vs Elizabeth Stevens / Ellen Munson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTina Reid / Janneke Vreede-Schaay vs Constance Campbell / Amber Oblinger6-2, 6-1
2025-08-06vs LCTA18/Bozigar/St.AndrewsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCelia Shore / Stacy Messersmith vs Caroline Jacky / Erica Garriss2-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Crivella / Sara Tierney vs Kiley Dempsey / Jennifer Klos2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelli Ransone / Tara White vs Christine Williams / Melissa Nehez Wingard4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Amy Poch
published 4
3.87
Adaire Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Myriam Owens
published
3.78
Hannah Story
published 3.5
3.77
Amy Ogiba
published 4
3.77
Elisabeth King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Kristin Korotney
published
3.61
Celia Shore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Laury Wehunt
published
3.56
Kelli Ransone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Janneke Vreede-Schaay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Michelle Crivella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Stacy Messersmith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Melody Sliker
published
3.34
Tara White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Lora Clarke
published
3.19
Laura Bowers
published
3.13
Sara Tierney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Hale
published
Tina Reid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Korotney + Janneke Vreede-Schaay5172% games+17.5% vs expected
Tara White + Janneke Vreede-Schaay6168% games+13.8% vs expected
Adaire Pennington + Elisabeth King14359% games+7.1% vs expected
Elisabeth King + Amy Ogiba7165% games+5.6% vs expected
Amy Ogiba + Celia Shore4655% games+4.7% vs expected
Adaire Pennington + Amy Poch8262% games+4.7% vs expected
Adaire Pennington + Tara White4255% games+4.5% vs expected
Adaire Pennington + Myriam Owens6359% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Poch
56W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Adaire Pennington
90W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Myriam Owens
43W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Hannah Story
55W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
4
Amy Ogiba
40W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elisabeth King
51W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Kristin Korotney
84W–27L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Celia Shore
47W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Laury Wehunt
67W–47L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Kelli Ransone
29W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Janneke Vreede-Schaay
77W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Michelle Crivella
89W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Stacy Messersmith
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Melody Sliker
21W–37L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Tara White
70W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Lora Clarke
27W–37L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Laura Bowers
36W–40L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Sara Tierney
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Hale
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Reid
115W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.