Teams

Brookes 6.0 Mixed

2026 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-02vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesBree Caudill / Donald Scarlett vs Jeffrey Balesh / Jennifer Schied3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZachary Tuck / Trina Culbreath vs Oliver Crain / Erin Christensen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Joe Gallagher vs Harrison Collins / Seema Iyer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-28vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenny Eddinger / Mark Rossi vs Carol Vidal / Richard Brandt5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Joe Gallagher vs Chip Desi / Dianna Sinofsky3-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Rossi / Bree Caudill vs Joe Eisenberg / Seema Iyer6-2, 6-2
2026-03-08vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXWon 21
L#1 DoublesJenny Eddinger / Joe Gallagher vs Jenn McLean / Ronit Mohapatra1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTrina Culbreath / Faisal Hussain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Greenwood / Mark Rossi vs Chip Desi / Allison Steinmetz6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Rossi / Cindy Greenwood vs Erin Christensen / Oliver Crain2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichel Brooks Sr. / Missale Solomon vs Jenn McLean / Ronit Mohapatra6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesZachary Tuck / Andrea Smolen vs Tom Cavers / Carol Vidal6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Jonathan Eom vs Dianna Sinofsky / Harrison Collins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBree Caudill / Donald Scarlett vs Colleen Begg / Joe Eisenberg6-7, 4-6
2026-01-23vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesFaisal Hussain / Bree Caudill vs Ronit Mohapatra / Jenn McLean3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichel Brooks Sr. / Cindy Greenwood vs Oliver Crain / Erin Christensen1-6, 6-7
2026-01-17vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Gallagher / Bree Caudill vs Joe Eisenberg / Jennifer Schied2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Bernknopf / Missale Solomon vs Richard Brandt / Allison Steinmetz1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDonald Scarlett / Trina Culbreath vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-12vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoe MacHovec / Missale Solomon vs Richard Brandt / Carol Vidal4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Eom / Trina Culbreath vs Colleen Begg / Joe Eisenberg4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-05vs Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MXSplit 11
L#1 DoublesZachary Tuck / Andrea Smolen vs Jeffrey Balesh / Seema Iyer6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFaisal Hussain / Missale Solomon vs Harrison Collins / Allison Steinmetz6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Crain - Bmore Tennis 6.0MX82201024219
2Brookes 6.0 Mixed28102042270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Faisal Hussain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Missale Solomon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Michel Brooks Sr.
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Mark Rossi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Donald Scarlett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jacob Bernknopf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Jonathan Eom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Trina Culbreath
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
Cindy Greenwood
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Joe MacHovec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Bree Caudill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jenny Eddinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Zachary Tuck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Faisal Hussain
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Missale Solomon
42W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Michel Brooks Sr.
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Mark Rossi
13W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–219L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Donald Scarlett
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Jacob Bernknopf
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Eom
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.74
3
Trina Culbreath
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Cindy Greenwood
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
2.5
Joe MacHovec
24W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Bree Caudill
1W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Jenny Eddinger
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Tuck
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.