Teams

Roth/40/7.5M/Combo/BVR

2026 LAF Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 Laf (40&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 6:00 PM
Youngsville Sports Complex
Sep 17 6:00 PM
Beaver Park
Sep 24 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Louis Roth
Oct 1 6:00 PM
Beaver Park
Oct 8 6:00 PM
The City Club at River Ranch
Oct 15 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Louis Roth
2026-08-27vs Barras/40/7.5M/Combo/CCRRWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobbie Lebas / Thomas Quinn vs Kyle George / Mike Sanders2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Puhekker / Corey Carriere vs John Moore / Fabian Lugo6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesGrady Abraham / Stuart Clark V vs Kade LeJeune / Brian Kerstetter4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Laf (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barras/40/7.5M/Combo/CCRR000000
2Fuselier/40/7.5M/Combo/YSC000000
3Roth/40/7.5M/Combo/BVR000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Christopher Cook
published 4
3.89
Ben Pok
published 4
3.86
Bryant Angelle
published 4
3.84
Matt Theriot
published
3.78
Robbie Lebas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Louis Roth
published
3.58
Corey Carriere
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Roy Meaders
published
3.43
Grady Abraham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Barrett Buxton
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Cook + Bryant Angelle404 matchesnot enough data
Robbie Lebas + Grady Abraham303 matchesnot enough data
Louis Roth + Ben Pok123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Cook
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Ben Pok
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Bryant Angelle
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Matt Theriot
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Robbie Lebas
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.78
Louis Roth
19W–19L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Corey Carriere
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.58
Roy Meaders
17W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Grady Abraham
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Barrett Buxton
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.