Teams

PM Ludington/Nashville

2025 Combo 55 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Wednesday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-24vs Freeland/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcella Tudeen / Jeannie Tapley vs Kim Bright / Susan Gorney7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Craft / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Linda Ashford / Mary Barton4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Pisano / Patricia Evans vs Laurie Farris / Ashley Freeland6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-14vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Frank / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Joni Jestings / Mary Agee6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Craft / Marcia Harris vs Robin Buchanan / Gay Suiter6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Pisano / Jeanne Ludington vs Jenny Barnes / Susan Furman5-7, 2-6
2025-09-07vs Freeland/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Frank / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Nell Adams / Mary Barton6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDewanda Carbine / Kerri Frye vs Betty Tudor / Glenda Anderson7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMelissa Metcalf / Julie Pearlman vs Wendy Baker / Susan Brown1-6, 4-6
2025-08-27vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Manley / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Susan Furman / Jenny Barnes6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarbara Pisano / Edith Nau vs Mary Fetherling / Joni Jestings1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Ludington / Marcia Harris vs Veronica Pulley / Amy Hirt4-6, 6-7
2025-08-13vs Freeland/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDewanda Carbine / Susan Manley vs Nell Adams / Mary Barton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKerri Frye / Mary Brennan vs Lisa Smith / Nancy King2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Harris / Edith Nau vs Wendy Baker / Betty Tudor7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-02vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerri Frye / Mary Craft vs Liza Gaston / Karen Vasil4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Frank / Shelly Wade vs Nancy Allan / Mary Fetherling4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarcella Tudeen / Jeannie Tapley vs Robin Buchanan / Susan Mattson7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.5 Women - Wednesday AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PM Ludington/Nashville2461226194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Susan Manley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Marcella Tudeen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Kerri Frye
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Jennifer Frank
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Barbara Pisano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Mary Craft
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Jeannie Tapley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Jeanne Ludington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Shelly Wade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Dewanda Carbine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Edith Nau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Patricia Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Julie Pearlman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Metcalf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannie Tapley + Jeanne Ludington5351% games+1.1% vs expected
Kerri Frye + Susan Manley1445% games−12.5% vs expected
Jeannie Tapley + Marcella Tudeen224 matchesnot enough data
Dewanda Carbine + Kerri Frye213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Manley
42W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
Marcella Tudeen
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Kerri Frye
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Frank
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
41W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3.5
Barbara Pisano
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.86
Mary Craft
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Jeannie Tapley
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Jeanne Ludington
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Shelly Wade
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Dewanda Carbine
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Edith Nau
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Patricia Evans
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Julie Pearlman
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.53
Melissa Metcalf
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.