Teams

Sundick/Greenbaum: Hot Shots Part Deuce

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-29vs Gramins/KadelbachLost 13
W#1 DoublesJonathan Saliterman / Ryan Rosoff vs Luke Knutson / Jeffrey Lindstrom6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDanny Kanter vs Steve Gramins5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Sundick / Brian Schumer vs Boyd Miller / Tom Shustarich1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEdgar Rapoport / Bill Kelly vs Jim Brown / Scott Lucas3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Danny Kanter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Jonathan Saliterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Adam Moss
published 4
3.80
Ryan Rosoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Jared Greenbaum
published
3.76
Jon Benowitz
published
3.72
Andy Finn
published 4
3.67
Alan Cosentino
published 4
3.54
Edgar Rapoport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Brian Schumer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Zachary Robins
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.33
Bradley Sundick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bill Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Saliterman + Ryan Rosoff3246% games−0.6% vs expected
Edgar Rapoport + Adam Moss3250% gamesnot enough data
Bradley Sundick + Alan Cosentino044 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Sundick + Adam Moss123 matchesnot enough data
Edgar Rapoport + Alan Cosentino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danny Kanter
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Jonathan Saliterman
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Adam Moss
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Ryan Rosoff
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Jared Greenbaum
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Jon Benowitz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Andy Finn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alan Cosentino
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Edgar Rapoport
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Brian Schumer
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Zachary Robins
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
4
Bradley Sundick
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.33
3.5
Bill Kelly
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.