Teams

Sa.Highsmith18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-23vs Ta.Anthony18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Jessica Swaney6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Taylor Anthony1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-09vs Cl.Baldwin18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Patch vs Nadeen Baddar6-0, 6-3
2024-10-02vs Ta.Anthony18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Jessica Swaney7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Jennifer Boney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Maria Burton6-2, 6-1
2024-09-11vs Ta.Anthony18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Samantha Brody Moses6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Jessica Swaney6-3, 6-3
2024-08-28vs Cl.Baldwin18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKristen Patch vs Nadeen Baddar6-4, 6-3
2024-08-21vs Ta.Anthony18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSally Highsmith vs Taylor Anthony6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Jennifer Boney6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Monty Goodrich6-1, 6-1
2024-08-07vs Cl.Baldwin18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesFerebee Plyler vs Claire Baldwin6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ferebee Plyler
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Sally Highsmith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Margaret Eller
published
3.00
Sarah Newton
published
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kristen Patch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Anna Applegate
published 2.5
2.18
Sarah Sims Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Patch + Sally Highsmith27567% games+6.7% vs expected
Kristen Patch + Anna Goodmon6355% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ferebee Plyler
87W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Sally Highsmith
159W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Margaret Eller
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
Sarah Newton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Anna Goodmon
76W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Kristen Patch
80W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
2.5
Anna Applegate
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Sims Chesson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.