Teams

Team Mason/Dvorak

2026 NMI Adult 55&O · 2026 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-23vs Team KaufmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Smock / Shawn Turoski vs Nicole Fender / Elizabeth Heeke6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFay Stroud / Ann Mason vs Gina Petherick / Elizabeth Ammond6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesValerie Dvorak / Sandy Piazza vs Phoebe Hodge / Amy MacKay6-4, 7-5
2026-06-28vs Team SteeleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheryl Smock / Shawn Turoski vs Diane Lindquist / Julie Beeker7-5, 4-2
L#3 DoublesDava Morrison / Renee Archambo vs Debra McKeon / Janet Popper4-6, 4-6
2026-06-27vs Team KaufmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFay Stroud / Sandy Piazza vs Renee Kaufman / Nicole Fender6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShawn Turoski / Ann Mason vs Wendy Stackable / JoAnn O'Connor7-6, 6-4
2026-06-27vs Team SteeleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smock / Valerie Dvorak vs Cynthia van Maanen / Eve Elden5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Mason / Sandy Piazza vs Diane Lindquist / Julie Beeker2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFay Stroud / Renee Archambo vs Janet Popper / Debra McKeon4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 NMI Adult 55&O 7.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Kaufman2042549
2Team Mason/Dvorak12451296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Ann Mason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Cheryl Smock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Fay Stroud
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Archambo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Turoski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Dvorak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Dvorak + Cheryl Smock1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Mason
5W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Cheryl Smock
15W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Fay Stroud
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Archambo
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shawn Turoski
14W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Dvorak
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.