Teams

BH - Duck/Shirley

2023 B'ham Combo - Adult 18 & Over Weekend · 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
KaKa Mixon
published
4.29
Anne Matthews
published 4.5
4.25
Amy Sanford
published 4.5
4.22
Kim Griffith
published
4.10
Julie Duck
published
3.75
Sarah Mizell
published
3.69
Kandy Shirley
published
3.55
Alyson Wood
published 4
Julie Burson
published
Lindsay Grant
published
Rasha Ziedan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Griffith + KaKa Mixon22365% games+5.1% vs expected
Kim Griffith + Sarah Mizell224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Griffith + Julie Duck404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Mizell + Alejandrina Herrera Fey123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Mizell + Amy Sanford303 matchesnot enough data
KaKa Mixon + Julie Duck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KaKa Mixon
79W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Anne Matthews
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Amy Sanford
18W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.25
Kim Griffith
86W–20L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
Julie Duck
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Alejandrina Herrera Fey
27W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Sarah Mizell
35W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Kandy Shirley
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Alyson Wood
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Julie Burson
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Grant
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rasha Ziedan
14W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.