Teams

CCV DeLacey

2023 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-14vs Woodlake RitterLost 01
L#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Cindy Birnbaum6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-09vs MAC ScottLost 12
L#1 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Katherine McDowell1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Mary Scott3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Deirdre Vaughan6-0, 6-0
2023-08-08Lost 01
L#3 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Jennifer Hughes4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-26Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Jennifer Smith0-6, 0-6
2023-07-12vs Westwood DunstanWon 20
W#2 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Louise O'Connor6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Jordan Harper7-5, 6-1
2023-07-03vs Woodlake RitterSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKerry DeLacey vs Hannah Ozment6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Christine Lemons3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.77
Amanda Galanti
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.67
Hyde Loupassi
published 4
3.42
Melissa Mauck
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.40
Laura West Hatcher
published
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry DeLacey + Amanda Galanti5148% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Amanda Galanti
86W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Hyde Loupassi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Melissa Mauck
69W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Laura West Hatcher
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.