Teams

Brunner/Bentonville/MP

2025 Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women - DAY LEAGUE NON-ADVANCING · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-22vs Pigo/Bentonville/MPWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Masters / Gina Baca vs Heather Wardle / Kelsey Webster6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy Brunner vs Natalie Houstman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMuriel Garza / Leah Ruck vs Gillian Ihle / Sarah Pigo3-6, 1-6
2025-04-10vs Pigo/Bentonville/MPLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Brunner / Melissa Hoekstra vs Gillian Ihle / Rachael Deboard7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Huitsing vs Erin Freeze4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Masters / Muriel Garza vs Sarah Pigo / Heather Wardle6-0, 6-2
2025-03-13vs Pigo/Bentonville/MPWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Baca / Sandy Brunner vs Gillian Ihle / Sarah Pigo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMuriel Garza vs Kelsey Webster2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Huitsing / Melissa Hoekstra vs Erin Freeze / Heather Wardle6-3, 6-1
2025-02-25vs Pigo/Bentonville/MPWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Brunner / Ellen Masters vs Katy Sears / Erin Freeze7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGina Baca vs Gillian Ihle2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Huitsing / Muriel Garza vs Kelsey Webster / Natalie Houstman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Gina Baca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
Leah Ruck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Ellen Masters
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Sandy Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.42
Laura Huitsing
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.23
Muriel Garza
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Melissa Hoekstra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Ruck + Laura Huitsing123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Gina Baca
8W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Leah Ruck
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
3
Ellen Masters
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Sandy Brunner
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Laura Huitsing
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
Muriel Garza
9W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Melissa Hoekstra
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.