Teams

Pausina/40s/7.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Cherie Pausina
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 12 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Cherie Pausina
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Burdette/40s/7.5/PAC1030018
2Pausina/40s/7.5/SC1124867
3Corales/40s/7.5/FAC0112429

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Michelle Biehler
usually #1 Doubles 94%, also #2 Doubles 6% · published
3.88
Deneen Neitzschman
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.87
Cherie Pausina
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Daysi Valencia
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.54
Alysha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Amy Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Amanda McInnis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jamie Quartano
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kara Feringa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Rhonda Eckholdt
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Stephanie Rolling
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Windy Montecino
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Biehler + Stephanie Rolling4264% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Slimming + Jamie Quartano6065% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Stephanie Rolling4158% gamesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kelly Slimming404 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Rhonda Eckholdt044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Biehler
36W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Deneen Neitzschman
9W–8L career · type A · 13 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Cherie Pausina
14W–18L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
3.5
Daysi Valencia
55W–12L career · 31 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Alysha Schroeder
18W–15L career · type A · 28 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Amy Arthur
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Amanda McInnis
18W–7L career · 12 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Jamie Quartano
52W–1L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kara Feringa
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · 33 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Eckholdt
30W–23L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Rolling
23W–15L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Windy Montecino
11W–13L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.