Teams

Middleburg

2021 SVTA Tri-Level Winter Women · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-05vs Don't Even Tri ItWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Wegdam / Ariane Carles vs Carisa Dueweke / Claire Odell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-02-27vs Davis/GreenLost 01
L#1 DoublesTara Wegdam / Ashley la Shelle vs Erin Green / Kristen Soh4-6, 4-6
2021-02-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesTara Wegdam / Maria Eldredge vs Leyla Lytle / Jennifer Cristofari6-3, 6-4
2021-02-19vs Don't Even Tri ItLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Mandia / Sheila Harrell vs Jeanne Dattilo / Claire Odell6-7, 1-6
2021-02-12vs Rally GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Tara Wegdam vs Jill Poretz / Linda Pongsugree6-2, 6-4
2021-02-05vs WCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Johnson / Tara Wegdam vs Stacey Stickley / Niki Gerhard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-01-22vs Rally GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAriane Carles / Tara Wegdam vs Maureen Bornholdt / Erica Gormley6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Maria Eldredge
published
3.66
Ashley la Shelle
published 4
3.46
Tara Wegdam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Brett Levy
published 3.5
Emily Hannum
published 3.5
3.24
Maureen St Germain
published
3.02
Julie Mandia
published
2.75
Lisa White
published
2.60
LOUISA WOODVILLE
published
2.45
Susan Jones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Eldredge
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Ashley la Shelle
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Tara Wegdam
104W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Brett Levy
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Emily Hannum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen St Germain
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Julie Mandia
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Lisa White
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
LOUISA WOODVILLE
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
Susan Jones
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.