Teams

Steed/Thompson/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - TUE AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-16vs Givens/Mouser/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesChristina Graves / Noelle Cotey vs Patricia Frawley / Catherine Pietsch3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Marcella vs Ellen Gooden1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Thorne / Caroline Nally vs Stephanie Protz / Leigh Ann Corley6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesChelsea Rice vs Brandy Kennedy3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Kenny / Emily Schell vs Mary Mouser / Janelle VanHootegem1-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs Korenberg/Lawrence/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesChelsea Rice / Christina Graves vs Christina Beattie / Dawn Cole2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoelle Cotey vs Katie Black6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaroline Nally / Allie Steed vs Jennifer Frank / Carly Lawrence7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKacey Passmore vs Myrvete Korenberg3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Kenny / Victoria Marcella vs Renee Anzivino / Jacque Ramsey2-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Cramer/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesChelsea Rice / Kacey Passmore vs Chiarra Jessey / Kate Thompson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoelle Cotey vs Lauren Wideman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLele Thompson / Allie Steed vs Megan McDugald / Kaelin Cramer4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesVictoria Marcella vs Brooke Scanlon2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Schell / Monica Kenny vs Traci Gilbert-Stafford / Kelly Dawson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-26vs George/Bernstein/NashvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesChelsea Rice / Noelle Cotey vs Kate Stout / Joy Cox6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Graves vs Alexandra Neff0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Kennedy / Katelyn Thorne vs Susana Huddleston / Anne Pope4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAllie Steed vs Elizabeth Davis0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarey Burch / Anne Ammons vs Marjorie George / JULIE GONTAREK1-6, 0-6
2025-03-12vs Stephens/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMonica Kenny / Allie Steed vs Jill Labetti / Laurel Dortch1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Graves vs Laura Monesmith6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLele Thompson / Carey Burch vs Amelia Stephens / Natalie Geng2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor Bartholomew / Caitlin Shirock vs Maret Caamano / Courtney Hall1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - TUE AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Kacey Passmore
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Caroline Nally
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Katelyn Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Chelsea Rice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Allie Steed
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Monica Kenny
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Eleanor Bartholomew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Graves
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Victoria Marcella
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Anne Ammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lele Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Emily Schell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Caitlin Shirock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Carey Burch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Ammons + Monica Kenny10262% games+9.2% vs expected
Noelle Cotey + Kacey Passmore314 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Passmore + Chelsea Rice224 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Thorne + Victoria Marcella123 matchesnot enough data
Lele Thompson + Eleanor Bartholomew033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Cotey
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kacey Passmore
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Caroline Nally
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katelyn Thorne
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Chelsea Rice
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Allie Steed
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Monica Kenny
21W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Eleanor Bartholomew
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Christina Graves
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Marcella
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anne Ammons
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Lele Thompson
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Emily Schell
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
2.5
Caitlin Shirock
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Carey Burch
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.