Teams

Lamis (Coral Pine)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 3.5 Adut 18 & over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-15vs Cordova (Tamiami Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicholas Lamis / Antonio de Cecchi vs Ronald Aponte / Bryant Carreno3-6, 3-6
2021-03-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAntonio de Cecchi / David Solares vs Juan Pomar / Rafael Calmet4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-02-25vs Cordova (Tamiami Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAntonio de Cecchi / Nicholas Lamis vs Alfredo Nunez / Ronald Aponte0-6, 2-6
2021-02-18vs Rodriguez (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSebastian Delgado / Antonio de Cecchi vs Lennyn Salinas / Mauricio Parra1-6, 0-6
2021-02-04vs Vitello (Doral Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Lamis / Ricky Wolcott vs Jose Medina / ROGER VALECILLOS2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-01-28vs Nunez (Coral Pine)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNicholas Lamis / Jason James vs Oscar Alvarez / Andre Sallato6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-01-21Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNicholas Lamis / Juan Pereda vs Simon Den Tuinder / Antonio Junco0-6, 1-6
2021-01-14vs Miami-Dade - Crandon/SenguptaLost 01
L#3 DoublesVincent Turturro / Nicholas Lamis vs Leonardo Concha / PATRICIO DERITO5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adut 18 & over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Griffin Riley
published 3.5
3.24
David Solares
published 3.5
3.15
Stephen Cohen
published
3.09
Ricky Wolcott
published
3.05
Antonio de Cecchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.62
Nicholas Lamis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Sebastian Delgado
published
Vincent Turturro
published
Zach James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Solares + Nicholas Lamis4845% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Griffin Riley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
David Solares
26W–49L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Stephen Cohen
7W–14L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Ricky Wolcott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Antonio de Cecchi
0W–11L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Nicholas Lamis
53W–135L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
2.62
Sebastian Delgado
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vincent Turturro
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zach James
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.