Teams

GR RED

2024 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

5 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-15vs CACM PINKLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesLauren Tinker / Kayley Sudac vs Victoria Anderson / Kaley Rickert6-7, 5-7
2024-07-08vs WP-O NAVYLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCarrie Hantge / Kayley Sudac vs Margaret Turner / AnnMarie Morrison7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-01vs CHCC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesCarrie Hantge / Kayley Sudac vs Kelly Stone / Courtney Berglund6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-17vs KNO NAVYSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesKayley Sudac / Lauren Tinker vs Jenni Young / Jodi Page2-6, 4-6
W#2 Female SinglesCarrie Hantge vs Brittany Wyeno6-2, 6-1
2024-06-10vs CACM PINKLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAndrea Godber / Kayley Sudac vs Lisa Miller / Victoria Anderson3-6, 1-6
L#1 Female SinglesCarrie Hantge vs Katherine Savoy1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-03vs WP-O NAVYLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesEMILY JENNINGS / Carrie Hantge vs Katelyn Albyn / Traci Winborne6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 Female SinglesKayley Sudac vs Margaret Turner0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
EMILY JENNINGS
published 3.5
2.97
Carrie Hantge
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Singles 20% · published 3
2.94
Kayley Sudac
usually #1 Female Doubles 83%, also #2 Female Singles 17% · published 3
2.80
Andrea Godber
published 3
2.48
Lauren Tinker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

EMILY JENNINGS + Carrie Hantge81145% games−3.5% vs expected
EMILY JENNINGS + Kayley Sudac404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
EMILY JENNINGS
31W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Carrie Hantge
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Kayley Sudac
43W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Andrea Godber
20W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Lauren Tinker
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.