Teams

RENO TENNIS CENTER 18AW3.5B

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jennifer Mann
published
3.31
JUDY Rounds
published 3.5
3.31
Cynthia Marment
published 3.5
3.23
Carol Britton
published 3.5
3.10
Keri Baer
published
3.01
Anne Ambrose
published 3.5
2.99
Maechel Morrison
published
2.96
Stacie Griffin
published
2.87
Lisa Seeling
published
2.77
Janese Stimmel
published
2.71
Carol Herzberg
published 3
2.64
Donnelyn Curtis
published 3
2.58
Dianne Hilliard
published 3
Nancy Mellen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maechel Morrison + Keri Baer2343% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Marment + JUDY Rounds213 matchesnot enough data
Keri Baer + Dianne Hilliard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Mann
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
JUDY Rounds
11W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Cynthia Marment
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Carol Britton
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Keri Baer
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Anne Ambrose
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
Maechel Morrison
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Stacie Griffin
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
Lisa Seeling
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Janese Stimmel
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carol Herzberg
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Donnelyn Curtis
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Dianne Hilliard
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Nancy Mellen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.