Teams

Houck/Knoxville/Tri55-4.0

2026 Tri-Level 55 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-08vs Teague/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesAllison Chandler / Stacy Carlson vs Tracy Collins / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Farley / Terri Bowers vs Shelly Krummen / Linda Bui2-6, 2-6
2026-03-07vs Wentz/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLinda Rankin / Stacy Carlson vs Susan Lahrs / Claudia Stallings5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Farley / Shannon Thackston vs Helena Liuag / Sandy Garrard6-4, 7-5
2026-02-08vs Whitehead/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAllison Chandler / Linda Rankin vs Janice Whitehead / Karen Benedict6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Farley / Shannon Thackston vs Lila Downs / Martha Wilds3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-25vs Curtin/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonica Freeman / Laura Ivey vs A Marie Kennedy / Tammy Simpson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Rankin / Stacy Carlson vs Rosemary Canada / Kimberly Nelson4-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Bonovich / Shannon Thackston vs Sarah Attkisson / Angela Rae Rhody6-1, 6-0
2026-01-18vs Teague/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAllison Chandler / Donna French vs Jodie Campbell / Michelle Luna4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMichelle Farley / Terri Bowers vs Karen Koester / Maggie Reynolds6-2, 7-5
2026-01-10vs Smead/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKris Gompert / Barbara Miller vs Debbie Shoemaker / Ginny Davis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna French / Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez vs Patsy Fischer / Wendi Arnold6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Farley / Terri Bowers vs Debra Chaniott / Linda Dayringer4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Whitehead/Knoxville5113517176
2Houck/Knoxville/Tri55-4.05110817146
3Teague/Knoxville3311716139
4Curtin/Knoxville1541430188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kris Gompert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Monica Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Linda Rankin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Debi Houck
published 3.5
3.39
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Laura Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Stacy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Donna French
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Michelle Farley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Terri Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Shannon Thackston
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Stephanie Bonovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez + Stacy Carlson4450% games−3.1% vs expected
Donna French + Debi Houck404 matchesnot enough data
Donna French + Stacy Carlson314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Rankin + Stacy Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Terri Bowers + Michelle Farley123 matchesnot enough data
Donna French + Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Ivey + Monica Freeman123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Thackston + Stephanie Bonovich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kris Gompert
44W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Monica Freeman
29W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Linda Rankin
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Debi Houck
21W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
35W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Laura Ivey
11W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.35
Stacy Carlson
44W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Donna French
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Michelle Farley
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Terri Bowers
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Shannon Thackston
32W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Stephanie Bonovich
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.