Teams

Suntree - Saunders

2025 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesChristina Carver / Carmal Lewis vs LInda Madyda / Michelle Smith0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Fischer / SARA BRESETTE vs Cynthia Simmons / Pauline Mitchell1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Hastings / Sharon Ford vs Sue Lutter / Jennifer Mitz1-0
2025-07-27vs EGYC - BoydWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Christina Carver vs Marja Welsh / Kimberly Turner6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Rowe / Nancy Fischer vs Liz Lamb / Kelly Allison6-4, 6-3
2025-07-20vs EFSC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Lori Ewing vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMandy Smith / Sharon Ford vs Suzanne Taylor / Ruthan Tattersall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-13vs Viera Regional Park - HuangLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarmal Lewis / Sandra Rowe vs Tanya Molony / Sara Hatfield7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Saunders / SARA BRESETTE vs Deena Helton / Jessica Shinn2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Hastings / Josie Buxton vs Ligia Moss / Petra Elliott1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDana Saunders / SARA BRESETTE vs Gabrielle Hebert / Katie Husty0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Smith / Sandra Rowe vs Lisa LeDoux / Stephanie Tran5-7, 3-6
2025-06-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarmal Lewis / Lori Ewing vs Alyssa Boyd / Linda Stout6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Saunders / SARA BRESETTE vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-15vs EFSC - TaylorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Christina Carver vs Nancy van Suetendael / Jan Johnson6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Hastings / Sharon Ford vs Susan Ford / Suzanne Taylor7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs Viera Regional Park - HuangLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Ewing / Amira Tolles vs Naomi Coleman / Tanya Molony6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Fischer / SARA BRESETTE vs Iliana Bleau / Jessica Shinn6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Christina Carver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Amira Tolles
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.58
Amy Gregory
published 4
3.45
Lee Harrington
published
3.42
Carmal Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Sandra Rowe
published
3.24
SARA BRESETTE
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.21
Nancy Charitat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Dana Saunders
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Nancy Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Mandy Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Josie Buxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amira Tolles + Christina Carver11262% games+9.9% vs expected
Nancy Fischer + Mandy Smith3745% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Fischer + SARA BRESETTE3345% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Charitat + Christina Carver6064% gamesnot enough data
SARA BRESETTE + Amira Tolles4262% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Charitat + Carmal Lewis2346% gamesnot enough data
Christina Carver + Carmal Lewis3256% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Rowe + Nancy Fischer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Carver
101W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Amira Tolles
91W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Amy Gregory
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Carmal Lewis
41W–63L career · 6 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sandra Rowe
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
SARA BRESETTE
102W–75L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Nancy Charitat
101W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Fischer
67W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Nancy Hastings
108W–120L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Mandy Smith
90W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Josie Buxton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.