Teams

Da.Breazeale40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-29vs Is.Pataki40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Joe Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Geoff Knight6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJason Grunberg vs Matthew Richman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Ga.Jimenez40SWon 10
W#1 SinglesJ Barnes Stephenson vs Allen Oliver6-2, 6-0
2026-07-15vs La.Brock40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Graham Schillmoller3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Lawrence Brock3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs Ben Thompson2-6, 6-7
2026-07-08vs Is.Pataki40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesJ Barnes Stephenson vs Joe Rodriguez4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Kevin Sibillia6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs Ken Glanville6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs Ga.Jimenez40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJason Grunberg vs Gabe Jimenez6-1, 7-6
W#3 SinglesBrian Hardwick vs Allen Oliver6-3, 6-4
2026-06-24vs La.Brock40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesJason Grunberg vs Enric Prat Codina1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Graham Schillmoller4-6, 3-6
2026-06-17vs Is.Pataki40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Joe Rodriguez0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTakayuki Yamato vs Geoff Knight1-6, 2-6
2026-06-10vs Ga.Jimenez40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Ted Lotchin6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniel Breazeale vs John Parsons7-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJ Barnes Stephenson vs Gabe Jimenez7-5, 4-5
2026-06-03vs La.Brock40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesRobert Whitehurst vs Jason Tuttle4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesJ Barnes Stephenson vs Lawrence Brock3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Brock40S8123412165
2Is.Pataki40S54131432234
3Da.Breazeale40S45131431241
4Ga.Jimenez40S1852246287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jason Grunberg
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.80
Daniel Breazeale
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.71
Robert Whitehurst
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.69
J Barnes Stephenson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.61
Brian Hardwick
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.57
Takayuki Yamato
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Grunberg
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Daniel Breazeale
216W–149L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Robert Whitehurst
15W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
J Barnes Stephenson
31W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Brian Hardwick
49W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Takayuki Yamato
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.