Teams

Sc.StJohn18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-09vs Ga.Fye18TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDoug Silverman / Howard Marsilio vs Joseph Brown / Kevin Manweiler6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Adam Whitesell vs Harrison Edwards / Britton Williams6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-27vs Pa.Dougherty18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Adam Whitesell vs Patrick Dougherty / Lenny Parrnelli3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-26vs Jo.Markham18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Robb Adams vs Andy Schrader / Marcus Tuttle1-6, 4-6
2023-07-20vs Ch.Wright18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Adam Whitesell vs Scott Lundy / Matthew Pare6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-17vs Ch.Lav18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Robb Adams vs Greg Myers / Brooks Lowe4-6, 3-6
2023-06-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Nolan Gesher vs Greg Cunningham / John Stephens6-4, 6-0
2023-06-08vs Bi.Green18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Robb Adams vs Ryan Busey / Mark Gentry4-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs Co.Sutler18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesGary McAuliffe / Robb Adams vs Jeremy Broglin / Michael Gee6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Adam Dailey
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Horney
published
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
published
Camilo Pena
published 4
3.74
Sterling Thomas
published
3.70
Scott St John
published
3.68
Howard Marsilio
published
3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Gary McAuliffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Adam Whitesell
published 3.5
2.98
Edward Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Dailey + Doug Silverman213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horney + Sterling Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Doug Silverman + Gary McAuliffe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Dailey
148W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
Matthew Horney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Ryan Lindsay
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Camilo Pena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sterling Thomas
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Scott St John
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Howard Marsilio
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Gary McAuliffe
83W–53L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Adam Whitesell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Edward Perkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.