Teams

RIDGEMARK G&CC CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesZachary Dwight / Adolfo Sanchez vs Paul Nguyen / Malvin Mercado6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKevin Allan / Andres Builes vs Mitch Priest / Michael Jones6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTony Culler / Ioan Magdei vs Bret Hammon / Rodrigo G Alonso6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJeff Culler / Andres Builes vs Mitch Priest / Malvin Mercado2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesZachary Dwight / David Fisher vs Paul Nguyen / Jason Reynolds3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Machmiller / Tony Culler vs Amir Ahmadzadeh / Paul Marshall6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Zachary Dwight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Kevin Allan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Allan Siongco
published 4
3.76
Andres Builes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ethan Lampe
published 4
3.74
Tony Culler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
3.46
Jack Jenney
published 4
3.38
Jeff Culler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
John Machmiller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Adolfo Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Norm Burchard
published
2.73
Greg Orsetti
published 3
Patrick McBrearty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Allan + Andres Builes6167% gamesnot enough data
Patrick McBrearty + Norm Burchard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Dwight
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.11
Kevin Allan
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Allan Siongco
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andres Builes
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ethan Lampe
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Culler
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Joselito Castro Nuevo
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Jack Jenney
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jeff Culler
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.38
John Machmiller
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Adolfo Sanchez
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Norm Burchard
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.24
3
Greg Orsetti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Patrick McBrearty
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.