Teams

LCTA18/Nipp/MPR

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Night

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-12vs LCTA18/Hakimi-Sigman/Snee FarmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoan McFadden / Lauren Cason vs Jennifer Wells / Olivia Sigman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Nipp / Silvia Carrara vs Jennifer Smith / Maureen Harmon6-4, 6-3
2025-10-29vs LCTA18/Cotter-Riggin/MPRLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Nipp / SUsan Hogeboom vs Gray Hudson / Molly Hatfield1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSilvia Carrara / Lynn Besancon vs Emily Epps / Rebekah Lockhart3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Stone
published 3
2.69
Alex Nipp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.69
Silvia Carrara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Dina Tizzard
published
2.55
Georgia Krewson
published
2.50
Kelsey Doddridge
published
2.38
Lauren Cason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Lynn Besancon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Meredith White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvia Carrara + Georgia Krewson3257% games+12.0% vs expected
Dina Tizzard + Georgia Krewson3944% games−3.3% vs expected
Dina Tizzard + Silvia Carrara134 matchesnot enough data
Silvia Carrara + Lynn Besancon123 matchesnot enough data
Silvia Carrara + Alex Nipp123 matchesnot enough data
Georgia Krewson + Meredith White033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Stone
2W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Alex Nipp
30W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Silvia Carrara
17W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Dina Tizzard
66W–82L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Georgia Krewson
61W–63L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kelsey Doddridge
13W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Lauren Cason
10W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Lynn Besancon
23W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
3
Christine Pochily
11W–24L career · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.25
Meredith White
10W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.