Teams

Roberts 3.5 55 Spring 23

2023 Decatur Spring Adult 55 and Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Sam Alfano
published
3.17
Larry Newman
published
3.11
Eugene McNutt
published 3.5
3.10
Chuck Lamar
published 3.5
3.10
Frank Roberts
published 3.5
2.94
Earl Leonard
published 3
J Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Roberts + Chuck Lamar1536% games−10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Alfano
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Larry Newman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Eugene McNutt
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Chuck Lamar
34W–75L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Frank Roberts
28W–55L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Earl Leonard
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
J Jones
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.