Teams

Brooklyn: Bernstein

2025 18&Over Women Brooklyn · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.56 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs SaludWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelody Peng / Ling Zhang vs Pamela Salud / Qing Fan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristine Rodeo vs Nikolet Krasniqi6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Ileana Kutler vs flora soto / Stephanie Miao6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Fila / Helen Xu vs Carolyn Preisser / Anastasiia Astiukova6-0, 6-4
2025-07-15vs TrujilloLost 23
W#1 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Cameron Suratt vs Jane Rizzo / Alison Bonaviso7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFrancesca Maxime vs Kirsten Berman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelody Peng / Ling Zhang vs Grace Appel / Lauren Tallon6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJacquelyn Lipson vs Pam Widener5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Groveman / Nancy Fila vs Edna Diolata / Gillian Thomas3-6, 6-7
2025-07-13vs SaludWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Leigh Flayton vs Dara Wang / Michelle Lau6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFrancesca Maxime vs Stephanie Miao6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelody Peng / Ling Zhang vs Pamela Salud / Katherine Borah6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTheresa Fisher vs Qing Fan6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Fila / Meghan Dunn vs flora soto / Nikolet Krasniqi3-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs SaludWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelody Peng / Ling Zhang vs Pamela Salud / flora soto6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Som Sikhounmuong6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIlene Miklos / Christine Rodeo vs Michelle Lau / Carolyn Preisser6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarlene Cookson-Wallace / Meghan Dunn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-26vs TrujilloSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Cameron Suratt vs Polina Shchukina / Jane Rizzo4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesFrancesca Maxime vs Susan Choung3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Melody Peng vs Virginia Terry / Rene Trujillo6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Groveman / Nancy Fila vs Edna Diolata / Deborah Paul6-4, 6-3
2025-06-22vs TrujilloWon 50
W#1 DoublesMelody Peng / Ling Zhang vs Grace Appel / Pam Widener6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFrancesca Maxime vs Lauren Tallon7-5, 1-5
W#2 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Jane Groveman vs Edna Diolata / Jeannie Schaldach4-6, 5-4
W#2 SinglesLisa Bernstein vs Stephanie Tzeng6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIlene Miklos / Helen Xu vs Deborah Paul / Robin Sacks3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-05vs TrujilloWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Cameron Suratt vs Rene Trujillo / Polina Shchukina3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnnette Welles vs Lauren Tallon6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIleana Kutler / Jacquelyn Lipson vs Jane Rizzo / Gillian Thomas6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMarie Chandra vs Kirsten Berman5-7, 3-0
W#3 DoublesMarlene Cookson-Wallace / Helen Xu vs Deborah Paul / Robin Sacks6-3, 7-6
2025-05-29vs SaludWon 32
L#1 DoublesLisa Bernstein / Theresa Fisher vs Pamela Salud / Michelle Kanaley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChrysanne Marzan vs Katherine Borah4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Flayton / Cameron Suratt vs Qing Fan / Nikolet Krasniqi5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMarie Chandra vs Karina Sahlin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIlene Miklos / Helen Xu vs flora soto / Zvia Shwirtz6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brooklyn: Bernstein0828925265
2Trujillo08181740323
3Salud0892960416

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Melody Peng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Annette Welles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Ileana Kutler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lisa Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Theresa Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Ling Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Leigh Flayton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Francesca Maxime
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Helen Xu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Jacquelyn Lipson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Christine Rodeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Jane Groveman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Chrysanne Marzan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Cameron Suratt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Nancy Fila
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Meghan Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Ilene Miklos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marie Chandra
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Marlene Cookson-Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Lou Bunn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melody Peng + Ling Zhang10076% games+15.2% vs expected
Annette Welles + Ling Zhang5071% games+14.3% vs expected
Ileana Kutler + Cameron Suratt9068% games+12.0% vs expected
Annette Welles + Theresa Fisher24860% games+8.7% vs expected
Leigh Flayton + Cameron Suratt6650% games+5.2% vs expected
Helen Xu + Christine Rodeo19857% games+4.5% vs expected
Ileana Kutler + Lisa Bernstein14656% games+3.1% vs expected
Nancy Fila + Jane Groveman15953% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melody Peng
117W–81L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Annette Welles
132W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.67
Ileana Kutler
60W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Lisa Bernstein
188W–163L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Theresa Fisher
39W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Ling Zhang
68W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Leigh Flayton
144W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Francesca Maxime
17W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Helen Xu
222W–143L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jacquelyn Lipson
38W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Christine Rodeo
125W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jane Groveman
37W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Chrysanne Marzan
57W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cameron Suratt
68W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Nancy Fila
59W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Meghan Dunn
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Ilene Miklos
27W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
Marie Chandra
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlene Cookson-Wallace
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Lou Bunn
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.