Teams

LWR Blabalots

2023 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 6.5 W Tuesday

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-10-31vs Sarasota/Ross/50&Over6.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Crawford / Karen Patchell vs Carola Ross / Lori Madden1-6, 3-6
2023-10-03vs The Heritage Oaks HottiesWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Ferlise / Karen Patchell vs Karen Cameron / Anna Cardito6-1, 6-0
2023-09-19vs Sarasota/Ross/50&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Patchell / Nancy Bartlett vs Lisa Pyser / Sandra Poston2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Carol Frazier
published 4.5
3.56
Karen Patchell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Beth Hill
published 3.5
3.30
Nancy Bartlett
published
3.23
Sarah Crawford
published
3.19
Claudia Kelly
published 3.5
3.12
Kerri Harter
published
3.07
Gina Ferlise
published
3.07
Cheryl Burton
published 3
3.06
Cheryl Johnson
published 3.5
3.03
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
3.03
Karen Quick
published
2.91
Cyndi Paxton
published 3
Patricia Winn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Ferlise + Cyndi Paxton5152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Frazier
18W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.51
4
Karen Patchell
87W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Beth Hill
30W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Nancy Bartlett
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Sarah Crawford
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Claudia Kelly
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Kerri Harter
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.12
Gina Ferlise
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Cheryl Burton
10W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Cheryl Johnson
2W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Karen Quick
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Cyndi Paxton
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Patricia Winn
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.