Teams

FCC Tie Breakers-Blakemore

2024 Fredericksburg Combo · Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-17vs Double Trouble-CaliriWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorota Sipko / Rachel Wadkins vs Nicole Fassnacht / Jill Huntington6-0, 6-2
2024-11-10vs Double Trouble-CaliriWon 10
W#2 DoublesDorota Sipko / Rachel Wadkins vs Lorrie Roberts / Mary Blake6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Jamie Stokes
published 3.5
3.04
Sophia Constantine
published
3.00
Megan Roberge
published
2.90
Linda Blakemore
published
2.80
Karen Franklin
published
Cary Scharf
published 3
2.74
Jamie Mcneill
published 3
2.57
Sharon Curlee
published
Liz Walsh
published
Madison Osleger
published
Rachael Day
published
Rachel Wadkins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jamie Stokes
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Sophia Constantine
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
Megan Roberge
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
Linda Blakemore
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Karen Franklin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Cary Scharf
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Sharon Curlee
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Liz Walsh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Madison Osleger
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachael Day
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Wadkins
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.