Teams

ROLLING HILLS CM7.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-02vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CM7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesAra Hamamjian / Kenneth Hoppe vs Aref El Natour / Julian Nguyen2-6, 6-7
2024-10-05vs SCOTT VALLEY CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrevor Scotto / Ara Hamamjian vs Wesley MacLaggan / Joe Gulash7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-22vs MARIN TC CM7.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesKenneth Hoppe / Ara Hamamjian vs Michael Franklin / Derek Boorse6-2, 6-2
2024-09-15vs HARBOR PT CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSachin Monga / Ara Hamamjian vs Peter Levi / Sulhi Akmehmet6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Sachin Monga
published
3.91
Eric David
published
3.83
Trevor Scotto
published
Andrew Patterson
published 4
3.66
Scott David
published
3.62
Kenneth Hoppe
published
3.60
Eric Zahra
published
3.57
Toby Tyler
published
3.52
Mark Britschgi
published
3.52
Patrick Rimbaud
published
3.50
Ara Hamamjian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Peter Halpern
published
3.31
Mark Latimer
published
3.28
Monte Zweben
published
3.15
Steven Lund
published
John Ybarra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toby Tyler + Peter Halpern033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sachin Monga
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Eric David
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
Trevor Scotto
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Andrew Patterson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott David
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Kenneth Hoppe
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Eric Zahra
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Toby Tyler
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Mark Britschgi
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Patrick Rimbaud
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Ara Hamamjian
57W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Peter Halpern
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Mark Latimer
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Monte Zweben
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Steven Lund
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
John Ybarra
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.