Teams

6-Mlong-Eno-18 3.0 Singles

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs 4-JDeConto/AKlein-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Krissy Anderson6-0, 6-1
2023-07-10vs 2-LSimmons-SVCWon 10
W#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Laura Caldwell6-0, 6-1
2023-06-27vs 5-KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#2 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Kensy Ryan6-1, 6-0
2023-06-13vs 7-LDubois-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Kristin Cooley6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesKari Lovetinsky vs Kirby Jethro6-7, 0-6
2023-06-06vs 3-LSargent-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesMegan Chiles vs Adrianne Charleston6-1, 6-0
2023-05-30vs 1-DAllen-DFCWon 10
W#3 SinglesKari Lovetinsky vs Ellie Turner6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Megan Chiles
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Montague
published
3.36
Jamie Moy
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.68
Hannah Gahagan
published
2.29
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Lovetinsky + Megan Chiles314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Chiles
154W–47L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Lisa Montague
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jamie Moy
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Hannah Gahagan
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.68
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.