Teams

En Fuego Carlsen W

2023 TRI-Level · En Fuego 5.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs PHX/Chai/TRI/5.0-4.5-5.0/WLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Carlsen / Andrea Urlaub vs Tracy Kuhle / Amy Kuhle3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Kovesdy / Kimberly Lanier vs Mele Bills / Polly Evans1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephani Schaefer / Michelle Cohrs vs Sarah Hamre / Gabrielle Blawn6-1, 6-1
2023-05-06vs PHX/Chai/TRI/5.0-4.5-5.0/WLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Fintell / Andrea Urlaub vs Christina Chai / Amy Kuhle6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Taylor / Julie Stelse vs Mele Bills / Cindy Blair2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Crownhart / Camilla Harrison vs Sarah Hamre / Rachel Ashby2-6, 2-6
2023-05-06vs PHX/Chai/TRI/5.0-4.5-5.0/WLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Fintell / Andrea Urlaub vs Tracy Kuhle / Amy Kuhle2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Kovesdy / Kimberly Lanier vs Cindy Blair / Mele Bills4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephani Schaefer / Michelle Cohrs vs Rachel Ashby / Gabrielle Blawn5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-05vs PHX/Chai/TRI/5.0-4.5-5.0/WWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Fintell / Tina Carlsen vs Tracy Kuhle / Christina Chai0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Stelse / Karen Taylor vs Polly Evans / Cindy Blair6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Crownhart / Camilla Harrison vs Gabrielle Blawn / Rachel Ashby6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for En Fuego 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Urlaub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Danielle Kovesdy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Jennifer Crownhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Stephani Schaefer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Camilla Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Julie Stelse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Taylor
published
Kimberly Lanier
published
Michelle Cohrs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Fintell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Carlsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephani Schaefer + Michelle Cohrs21859% games+6.5% vs expected
Jennifer Crownhart + Camilla Harrison573952% games+3.2% vs expected
Michelle Cohrs + Danielle Kovesdy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrea Urlaub
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Danielle Kovesdy
66W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Crownhart
192W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Stephani Schaefer
127W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Camilla Harrison
143W–195L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Julie Stelse
32W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Taylor
25W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Lanier
26W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Cohrs
70W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Fintell
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Carlsen
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.