Teams

Stonebrook

2023 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Saunders / Teresa Koch vs Sheila Harrell / Lauren Woolcott2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-11vs On the RiseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoan Cestaro / Teresa Koch vs Theresa Manion / Judi Shoemaker5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Minicucci vs Stephanie Kennedy5-7, 0-6
2023-07-06vs Mood SwingsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Robbie Marchant vs Ashley Plexico / Nancy Sicairos6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs LGCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesTeresa Koch / Elizabeth Minicucci vs Lindsey Frye / Patti Sinnen6-2, 6-3
2023-06-20vs Sweet ShotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Lee / Roberta Lake vs Leanne Drake / Donna James6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Saunders / Teresa Koch vs Annie Baba / Mary Beth Williamson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-13vs BessaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRoberta Lake / Page Groseclose vs Shannon Pettit / HEATHER HUGHES6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Minicucci / Dana Kelly vs Kelly Stanley / Angela Kane3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Teresa Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Kristen Pettrone
published
3.32
Roberta Lake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Elizabeth Minicucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Robbie Marchant
published
3.24
Mary Saunders
published
3.04
Page Groseclose
published
2.98
Dana Kelly
published 3.5
2.63
Shirley McInturff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Minicucci + Roberta Lake13854% games+9.4% vs expected
Mary Saunders + Elizabeth Minicucci6165% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Teresa Koch
23W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kristen Pettrone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Roberta Lake
66W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Elizabeth Minicucci
64W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Robbie Marchant
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Mary Saunders
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Page Groseclose
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dana Kelly
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98
Shirley McInturff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.