Teams

Pinellas - McMullen/King

2021 Pinellas Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-27vs McMullen Double ShotsWon 20
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Ethel Murphy vs John Lowe / Lisa Lowe7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid King / Caralyn Paul vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-23vs McMullen Double ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Rhonda Mendoza vs Anne Pulley / John Lowe6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Lynn O'Brien vs Felix Herrera / Lisa Lowe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid King / Caralyn Paul vs Laura Hungiville / Clark Higgs6-4, 6-0
2021-05-23vs McMullen Double ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burdick / Dane Houston vs John Lowe / Anne Pulley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-12vs McMullen Double ShotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid King / Caralyn Paul vs Jennifer Bell / John Lowe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDane Houston / Elizabeth Burdick vs Chris Eversole / Laura Hungiville4-6, 6-7
2021-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesDane Houston / Rhonda Mendoza vs Susan Cartwright / James Plunkett6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kim Cashman-King
published
3.87
Rhonda Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Ethel Murphy
published 4
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Burdick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.61
Caralyn Paul
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Mendoza + Dane Houston213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Cashman-King
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Rhonda Mendoza
162W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Ethel Murphy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Burdick
222W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · 3 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.