Teams

Steinhausler/Memphis

2026 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 5.5 40 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 9:00 AM
St Georges Independent School
Sep 15 9:00 AM
H.W. Cox Tennis Complex
2026-09-01vs Pappas/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Craven / Tamara Steinhausler vs Leigh Ann Carkeet / WENDY Vines6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMandy Gootzeit / Tammy Evangelisti vs Teresa Donahue / Michelle Ragan3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAllison Webb / Aimee Puryear vs Jennifer Stettler / Kim Pappas2-6, 5-7
2026-08-25vs Pappas/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Craven / Sherene Katzman vs Jennifer Stettler / Michelle Ragan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Rohlinger / Julie Umansky vs Theresa Heist / Lisa Lasso6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFlavia Posey / Tammy Evangelisti vs Kathy Ferrara / Ann Ray2-6, 3-6
2026-08-18vs Pappas/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesShawnelle Davis / Samantha Rohlinger vs Melissa Fleenor / Lisa Lasso3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherene Katzman / Allison Webb vs Michelle Ragan / Susan Gambrell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJamie Earnest / Selma Beaulieu vs Shaila Anderson / Leigh Ann Carkeet6-2, 6-3
2026-08-11vs Pappas/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Burford / Samantha Rohlinger vs WENDY Vines / Theresa Heist6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShawnelle Davis / Jeanne Cannon vs Kristin Hicks / Lisa Lasso6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFlavia Posey / Kara Richetti vs Sandy Simcoe / Susan Gambrell3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Julie Umansky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Sherene Katzman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Shawnelle Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Rachel Burford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Emily Craven
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Tamara Steinhausler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Jamie Earnest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Diana Galdieri
published 3
2.48
Tammy Evangelisti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Kara Richetti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Samantha Rohlinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Aimee Puryear
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Allison Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
Mandy Gootzeit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Jeanne Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Misty Mullis
published
1.96
Flavia Posey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Cannon + Emily Craven224 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Rohlinger + Aimee Puryear314 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Earnest + Rachel Burford123 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Burford + Samantha Rohlinger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Umansky
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Sherene Katzman
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Shawnelle Davis
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Rachel Burford
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57
Emily Craven
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Tamara Steinhausler
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jamie Earnest
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Diana Galdieri
19W–28L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Tammy Evangelisti
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Kara Richetti
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
Samantha Rohlinger
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
3
Aimee Puryear
7W–14L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Allison Webb
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Mandy Gootzeit
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Jeanne Cannon
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Misty Mullis
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Flavia Posey
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.