Teams

Enk/40/4.5-3.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Tri Level 40 & Over - Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-17vs Edwards/40/4.5-3.5/COQWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Martin / Kristine Ball vs Jane Kuebel / Mamie Baker7-5, 6-3
2026-08-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Rogge / Kristie Zibilich vs Lynette Blossman / Amy Burdette6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Tri Level 40 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Enk/40/4.5-3.5/PAC3081473
2Edwards/40/4.5-3.5/COQ031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Catt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Kourtney Kentzel
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristie Zibilich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine Ball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Michelle Otillio
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Ronda Walters
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronda Walters + Shannon Enk9754% gamesnot enough data
Ronda Walters + Mary Toce3450% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Enk + Mary Toce213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Catt
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kourtney Kentzel
17W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristie Zibilich
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kristine Ball
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Martin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Toce
41W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Otillio
11W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ronda Walters
32W–18L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Enk
52W–32L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.