Teams

4 Westwood Cosby

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-30vs 5 MAC TiernanLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Kelly Berry vs Mary Scott / Susanne Nazur6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesLiza Hause / Alison Wayland vs Stephanie Williams / Karen Ellis6-2, 6-0
2022-07-16vs 2 Avalon LancasterLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiza Hause / Katie Gerecke vs Lucinda Stuckey / Nicole Wyman2-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs 1 Belmont StewartWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Jill Prince vs Paige Oostdyk / Jane Colgin3-6, 6-5, 1-0
2022-07-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Jill Prince vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-25vs 1 Belmont StewartWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Jimenez / Liza Hause vs Victoria Bradt / Susan Vonderlehr Nolan6-2, 6-3
2022-06-11vs 5 MAC TiernanLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Gerecke / Emily Dunstan vs Sonya Carman / Addie Miller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiza Hause / Leigh Detreville-Long vs Kasey Hammond / Therese Jones3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Barbara Hassett
published 4
3.56
Katie Gerecke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Liza Hause
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.17
Jessica van Tuyle
published
3.16
Rose Yuen
published
3.13
Kelly Berry
published
Jill Prince
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liza Hause + Katie Gerecke1638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Hassett
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Katie Gerecke
110W–125L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Liza Hause
210W–142L career · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Jessica van Tuyle
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Rose Yuen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kelly Berry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jill Prince
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.