Teams

SFV - Grand Slammin' You

2025 Mixed 18+ Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-29vs SFV - String CourtetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Lambe / Catherine Haggett vs Brett Bennett / Seve Sanchez6-4, 6-2
2025-03-26vs SFV - Penn PalsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Parent / Keith Small vs Matthew Banojakedjian / Nicole Park5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Eric Thies vs Jenny Isaacson / Cameron Glasgow5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-02vs SFV - Smash & DashLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Keith Small vs Stella Dumlao-Idea / Jaime Tovar0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Parent / Rod Shimamoto vs Diane Quan / Pei Xu1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-23vs SFV - Aceholes 7.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRod Shimamoto / Aimee Alejandre vs Sandra Zane / Dusty Summers2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-15vs SFV - Pure DriveLost 01
L#3 DoublesAimee Alejandre / John Rubeli vs Jimmy Lee / Tracy HASBANIAN4-6, 2-6
2025-01-18vs SFV - The 300's 7.0MxLost 01
L#1 DoublesAimee Alejandre / John Rubeli vs LUIS SANCHEZ / Lianne Noddle6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 7.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
David Sire
published 4
3.50
Aimee Alejandre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Keith Small
published
3.43
Christine Daniel
published 3.5
3.43
Madi Rosenberg
published
3.37
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Parent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.18
Christine de la Hoz
published 3.5
Carolyn Newsome
published 3
Robin Fishman
published
Tina Glantz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
David Sire
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Aimee Alejandre
81W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.50
Keith Small
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Christine Daniel
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Madi Rosenberg
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Michelle Parent
104W–137L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Christine de la Hoz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Carolyn Newsome
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Fishman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Glantz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.