Teams

MEMPK FURR

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs CCOC BOOKWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaron Dumler / Anne Mark vs Mary Simmons / Allison Johnson6-4, 7-5
2023-07-06vs CSRC MCCLENDONWon 30
W#1 DoublesTheresa Watson / Tracy Glaser vs Jeannie Roeber / Julia Hershey6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAmanda Irons vs Jinda Booth6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCaron Dumler / Katherine Crumpton vs Deb Shipwash / Karen Newton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-29vs LTFCS MUELLERWon 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Watson / Tracy Glaser vs Patricia Sarmiento / Jean Mueller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Shannon McCrary / Suzanne Draper6-0, 6-4
2023-06-22vs CCOC BOOKWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracy Glaser / Theresa Watson vs Kolsie Coleman / Tracy Coons6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAmanda Irons vs Michelle Erlander2-0
2023-06-19vs LTFCS MUELLERWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Watson / Tracy Glaser vs Amy Obenchain / Ruth Zwolinski6-2, 6-1
2023-06-15vs CSRC MCCLENDONLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmanda Irons / Caron Dumler vs Jeannie Roeber / Lou Ann McClendon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Theresa Watson
published
3.48
Tracy Glaser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.19
Jennifer Furr
published
3.18
Amanda Irons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Caron Dumler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Carly Wilson
published 3.5
2.96
Katherine Crumpton
published
2.80
Kirsten Matheson
published
2.73
Anne Mark
published 3
Holly Kimm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caron Dumler + Amanda Irons5948% games−5.1% vs expected
Katherine Crumpton + Kirsten Matheson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Watson
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Tracy Glaser
48W–61L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Caron Dumler
52W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carly Wilson
9W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
Katherine Crumpton
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
Kirsten Matheson
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Anne Mark
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Holly Kimm
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.